Introduction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) uses computers to model intelligent behaviors with minimal human
intervention, enabling tasks such as decision-making and prediction (Ayorinde et al., 2024).
As a data-driven paradigm, AI aligns seamlessly with technology-driven fields like
radiography (Hardy & Harvey, 2020). Radiographers are members of the multidisciplinary
healthcare team, educated, clinically competent, and legally authorized to perform
radiography, medical imaging, and radiotherapy procedures for diagnostic, therapeutic, and
research purposes using ionizing radiation, sound waves, magnetically induced signals, or
radioactive materials (International Society of Radiographers and Radiological
Technologists, 2021).
Radiographers bridge technology and patient care by operating advanced imaging and
radiotherapy equipment while ensuring patient safety, positioning them as key agents in AI
integration (Akudjedu et al., 2023; Stogiannos et al., 2025). The vast patient data generated
in radiography practices supports big data analytics and machine learning, driving the
development of AI-driven diagnostic tools. This expertise makes radiographers essential in
implementing AI to enhance diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and overall healthcare delivery
(Hardy & Harvey, 2020).
The Future of AI in Medical Radiography, Imaging, and Radiotherapy
The increase in the burden of lifestyle diseases, rising healthcare costs, and challenges such
as pandemics, conflicts, and workforce shortages globally is driving the need for AI-driven
interventions (ShiftMed Team, 2024). Therefore, the application of AI in medicine has come
to revolutionize and fast-track the achievement of the quadruple aims of healthcare: to
improve population health, enhance patient care, support providers, and reduce healthcare
costs (Colvin, 2020). For example, AI is transforming medical imaging and radiotherapy by
enhancing diagnostics, optimizing workflows, reducing errors, and improving efficiency
(Bajwa, 2021).
AI tools can analyze large datasets generated in clinical areas, predict outcomes, and
recommend treatments with greater accuracy (Colvin, 2020). The incorporation of AI insights
in medical imaging and radiotherapy has supported better diagnosis, treatment protocols,
workflow efficiency, and referral systems (Bajwa, 2021). From a radiographer’s perspective,
AI applications span the entire imaging workflow, from pre-examination planning to image
acquisition and post-processing and beyond (Akudjedu et al., 2023). This underscores the
surge of AI applications into the radiographers’ clinical practice.
Pre-examination assessment
Radiographers play an essential role in patient care before, during, and after imaging or
radiotherapy procedures. While AI cannot replace these responsibilities, it enhances
efficiency by automating patient queue management, vetting referrals, and validating
clinical indications against appropriate imaging modalities and techniques. Additionally, AI
interacts with electronic health records to verify patient identification, streamlining
workflows and improving overall radiographer efficiency.
Examination planning
AI optimizes patient parameters through intelligent systems, supporting personalized
healthcare during imaging planning. AI aids radiographers in carrying out their roles, like
patient positioning, contrast administration, and protocol selection, subsequently enhancing
precision and efficiency in imaging procedures.
Image acquisition
Selecting the appropriate imaging protocol based on patient presentation, clinical
questions, and the region of interest is a key responsibility of radiographers. However,
protocols vary across hospitals, imaging modalities, and individual radiographers.
Automating imaging protocols and dose optimization through AI software will help
standardize the practices, reduce turnaround times, and enhance patient safety.
Image processing
AI enhances medical imaging by automating post-processing, improving image quality,
segmenting anatomical structures, and detecting abnormalities, reducing radiographers'
workload. It aids in triaging by flagging critical cases for faster review, improving workflow
efficiency. Machine learning models identify disease patterns, supporting early detection
and decision-making. AI-driven synthetic modality transfer enables the conversion of images
between modalities (e.g., CT to MRI), thereby minimizing radiation exposure and reducing
the need for repeat scans. Additionally, AI ensures consistency in image interpretation,
standardizes quality control, and eliminates interpersonal variability across healthcare
facilities (Mohammad et al., 2024; Colvin, 2020).
The Paradigm to Radiographers’ Perceptions of AI
Several studies have been conducted globally to explore radiographers' levels of knowledge,
perspectives, and expectations regarding AI applications in radiography, imaging, and
radiotherapy. According to Akudjedu et al. (2023), a lack of AI applications’ education and
training among radiographers is the leading cause of poor utilization, perception, and
knowledge globally. Equally, Ayorinde et al. (2024) allude that a lack of understanding of
inputs and algorithms for AI and AI outputs among healthcare workers contributes to low
radiographers' perception and utilization of AI. Radiographers should fully understand the
benefits and risks of AI to be able to make informed choices about its integration into
radiography practices. The negative perceptions of a significant section of radiographers
toward AI are compounded by their suspicion that it might take or substitute their jobs
(Stogiannos et al., 2025).
According to Sezgin (2023), AI is complementing radiographers by enhancing
their skills rather than replacing them, leading to a paradigm shift in healthcare.
As AI becomes an essential component of modern healthcare, organizations must
invest in the necessary infrastructure, training, resources, and partnerships to
facilitate its successful adoption and ensure equitable access for all.
Ethical Considerations in AI Use in Medical Radiography, Imaging, and Radiotherapy
AI integration in radiography, medical imaging, and radiotherapy holds great
promise by enhancing, not replacing, radiographers. However, its adoption must
be guided by strong ethical principles, including transparency, accountability,
patient safety, data privacy, and equitable access (Sezgin, 2023). Furthermore,
according to Davenport and Kalakota (2019), as smart machines begin to assist in
clinical decision-making, a range of ethical implications must be carefully considered.
These include concerns around accountability for decisions made or influenced by AI,
the transparency of algorithms and processes, the need for informed consent when AI
tools are involved in patient care, and the protection of patient privacy and data security.
Shinners et al. (2019) found that a lack of trust in AI delivering healthcare and
improving patient outcomes among a section of healthcare practitioners also
contributed to a negative perception of AI. Furthermore, Akudjedu et al. (2023)
found that the lack of or poor AI regulatory and governance framework
and alignment across different countries or geopolitical settings has affected full
utilization or uptake of AI applications among professionals like radiographers.
According to Stogiannos et al. (2025), radiographers in Europe have not yet fully
embraced AI integration in their practice. However, with increasing knowledge and
training, the perception that AI will replace their roles is gradually diminishing.
The fear of the unknown among radiographers has contributed to a slower-than-expected
adoption of AI. Additionally, Ayorinde et al. (2024) note that the integration of AI
in radiography faces challenges related to the implementation of innovations. A study by
Mohammad et al. (2024) indicated that although there is generally a positive
attitude among radiographers and radiologists toward learning AI and its
integration into practice, there are barriers such as a lack of training in AI
and exposure to resources, which is the greatest setback to radiology AI integration.
The UK radiographers, according to Rainey et al. (2024), expressed mixed feelings
about AI in radiography practice, with some feeling that AI will kill the
profession, while others feel AI brings better professional prospects and synergies.
This calls for ongoing ethical oversight, institutional governance, and a commitment
to uphold professional standards in the face of rapid technological advancement.
Foundational Truth
The development of AI in healthcare relies heavily on vast amounts of validated, real-world
patient data, which must be treated as foundational truth for algorithm training
(Brady; Davenport & Kalakota, 2019). However, this process raises significant
ethical concerns, particularly around patient confidentiality and data security.
Furthermore, there is a risk of algorithmic bias when AI systems developed in one
context based on specific factors such as race, gender, environment, or disease
patterns are used in a different setting without proper adaptation. This can lead to
unfair decisions, resulting in unequal treatment and potential harm to certain
groups of patients (Geis et al., 2019). To ethically harness AI's potential, healthcare
must prioritize transparency, accountability, and the protection of human rights, while
resisting the misuse of radiological data for unethical or purely financial purposes.
According to Geis et al. (2019), much of AI operates in a "black box," making it
essential to ensure interpretability (the ability to understand how AI systems reach
decisions), explainability (the ability to communicate these decisions to non-experts),
and transparency (the ability for third parties to review and understand the
decision-making process).
Addressing these ethical challenges is essential to ensure that the integration of
AI in healthcare upholds trust, equity, and professional integrity. Ensuring that AI
systems are used responsibly requires clear guidelines to protect patient rights
and uphold ethical standards in clinical practice. To ensure responsible
integration of AI, healthcare organizations and professionals must
invest in proper infrastructure, training, and oversight, prioritizing human dignity
and ethical standards in all AI-supported care.
AI Ethical Considerations in Radiography and Radiotherapy
Beneficence (Do-no-harm)
The ethical integration of AI in healthcare, particularly in radiography,
imaging, and radiotherapy, must be grounded in core principles such as
respecting human rights and freedoms, ensuring transparency and accountability,
and maintaining human control and responsibility over clinical decisions
(Varkey, 2020). As AI systems inevitably impact diagnosis and treatment, it
becomes essential to define clear accountability frameworks for errors or
unintended consequences, ensuring that responsibility is not obscured by
technological complexity.
The radiographers’ goal should be to maximize value through the ethical use of
AI, prioritizing patient welfare and clinical integrity while resisting the lure of
financial gain from unethical exploitation of data or AI tools (Geis et al., 2019).
The Code of Conduct for Radiographers emphasizes the importance of
compassion, professionalism, and ethical conduct in patient care (Health and Care
Professions Council (HCPC), 2016). These human qualities, respect, dignity, empathy,
effective communication, and professionalism, are essential in healthcare and cannot be
replaced by AI. Radiographers play a crucial role in both diagnosing and
supporting patients throughout their care journey, ensuring trust and comfort
(Varkey, 2020).
Regulatory frameworks, guidelines, and policies on AI use
The Society of Radiography in Kenya (SORK) has developed various guidelines and
manuals to support the professional interests of radiographers in Kenya. These
resources include the SORK Constitution, the Radiographers Act No. 28 of 2022, and
other policy documents that provide a framework for the practice of radiography
in Kenya (www.sork.org.ke). Additionally, the Kenya National AI Strategy 2025
emphasizes the importance of creating unified legal frameworks and ethical
guidelines to guide AI development and ensure governance and regulatory
frameworks remain agile to accommodate evolving technologies (ICT Authority).
These efforts highlight the need for comprehensive regulatory frameworks,
guidelines, and policies to support the integration of AI in radiography and
imaging, ensuring responsible development and deployment of AI technologies.
Radiographers have an ethical duty to understand the clinical validity of
datasets used to develop AI algorithms and how these algorithms process data in
clinical settings. They must also ensure that the data reflects the patient
population accurately, as biases in the data can negatively affect patient care.
Ethics of data ownership and privacy
Handling AI data in healthcare is complex internationally, as different countries
balance personal rights and collective social welfare in varying ways (Geis et al.,
2019). While radiology and radiotherapy departments typically own the imaging
and treatment data, patients still retain the legal right to a copy of their data and
maintain ownership and control over their personal and sensitive information,
including both medical and non-medical data.
Therefore, explicit patient consent is required for sharing or using this data
to develop AI algorithms. Exploitation, mining, and misuse of patients' data for
financial gain without consent borders unethical conduct (Davenport & Kalakota,
2019). Radiographers must ensure that patients' data is consented to before it is
used to develop AI algorithms.
Lack of Empathy
The Code of Conduct for Radiographers emphasizes the importance of
compassion, professionalism, and ethical conduct in patient care. Radiographers
are expected to prioritize patient well-being, communicate clearly, and offer
emotional support, especially when delivering life-changing news. These human
qualities cannot be replicated by AI.
Radiographers need appropriate training to confidently lead in AI-driven clinical
transformation, enhance patient care, and contribute to research and innovation in
imaging and radiotherapy services. The relevant line ministry, health
regulators, and professional associations such as the Society of Radiography in
Kenya (SORK), in consultation with experts and technology drivers, need to integrate
the regulatory frameworks, guidelines, and policies to support AI in radiography
and imaging.
These frameworks should ensure responsible development and
deployment of AI, focusing on accountability, transparency, fairness,
and patient rights, while minimizing biases and improving patient care
through strict oversight and governance.
Conclusion
AI is set to significantly impact radiography and radiotherapy, with
radiographers playing a key role in integrating AI into their clinical practice.
While AI will not replace radiographers, it will augment their work, particularly in
enhancing efficiency, effectiveness, quality, and standardized imaging,
precision, and help in triaging, ultimately reducing turnaround times and improving
overall patient care experience.
Despite current uncertainty among radiographers about AI’s impact on careers and daily
practice, especially in LMICs, studies have shown that useful deployment of AI
transforms the radiographers' work, and hence there is a need to embrace and celebrate
the technology. However, for successful adoption, AI must be regulated,
integrated into systems, and supported by targeted education. Radiographers need
appropriate training to confidently lead in AI-driven clinical transformation, enhance
patient care, and contribute to research and innovation in imaging and
radiotherapy services.
Author: Jevas Kenyanya
President Society of Radiography in Kenya (SORK)